Is Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business at NYU, teaching classes in corporate finance and valuation, primarily to MBAs.
We had a sort of one way confrontation last year in May.
He is a bright mind, likely the best in the world in Valuing business from a pure fundamental stand point (except few flaws in intangibles in specifics domains like Luxury) .
Inloved with the science as I am , is an enormous pleasure to read him after 1 year less deterministic and ....
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TO Aswath Damodaran AND TO THE BLOG "MUSING ON MARKETS"
WE DO DO NOT OWN ANY RIGHTS ON THIS POST AND ON ITS CONTENTS
COURTESY OF Aswath Damodaran AND THE BLOG "MUSING ON MARKETS"
TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011
Catastrophe and consequences for value
The airwaves have been inundated with news about natural disasters in Japan and their aftermath. Without minimizing the human impact - the thousands who have lost their lives and belongings - and the dangers of a nuclear meltdown, I want to focus on the impact of catastrophes, natural or man-made, on markets and asset values. While each disaster is different, here are some common themes that emerge after the disaster:
a. Our definition of "long time periods" is woefully inadequate: After the quake, which measured 8.9 on the Richter scale and ranked as one of the five strongest in recorded history, it was noted that nothing of this magnitude had been seen in Japan over the last 300 years. Since much of the regulation (of construction and nuclear power plants) had been structured based upon past history, they proved inadequate for the quake. As I look at how much of what we do in corporate finance and valuation is based upon time periods of 80-100 years (if we are lucky) and 10-20 years (if we are not), I wonder how much we are missing as a consequence of our dependence on the past........
a. Our definition of "long time periods" is woefully inadequate: After the quake, which measured 8.9 on the Richter scale and ranked as one of the five strongest in recorded history, it was noted that nothing of this magnitude had been seen in Japan over the last 300 years. Since much of the regulation (of construction and nuclear power plants) had been structured based upon past history, they proved inadequate for the quake. As I look at how much of what we do in corporate finance and valuation is based upon time periods of 80-100 years (if we are lucky) and 10-20 years (if we are not), I wonder how much we are missing as a consequence of our dependence on the past........